There is no way to alter my feelings but to get America and the world to reject Monsanto and the Pharmaceuticals trying to alter nature and man for profit and not overall healthy benefit. We and the world that we are a part of, all of it is being manipulated into an artificially supported existence.
Think of your beautiful son's or daughter's children and know they will only be able to stay alive if they take the drugs.
Right now it is happening to our food chain wholesale. It is not a question. It is only to muster enough strength to combat it. It is truly the war of the world. It is the final battle if it is lost.
The World According to Monsanto http://current.com/topics/85538011_monsanto/ Every documentary on this site is clear and supported. What Monsanto is doing to the food chain through genetics and chemicals like Roundup; bringing produce entirely under its control, is what is happening to people and fostered through the FDA,WHO and every government agency world wide. Monsanto completes this picture by buying up all other seed companies, Natural Health companies that can be bought or coerced into their fold.
The tactic is simple Greed brings the Ally. Money.
If you examine a few of these documentaries including http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0AL4yml3bw&NR=1 A chilling story of how Monsanto killed a Fox major documentary about Bovine Cow Hormone made by Monsaanto.
How can we regain possession of our lives and the world we live in. Is it possible?
Everyone knows this truth in about an hour of watching You Tube. No one to date who is really heard in the world is leading a concerted opposition in every country of the world. No one. No Religious leader, no country leader, not even any opposition parties.
We the people and we the land are not represented at the table. Scientists know and cannot gain enough force to lead us. We must lead ourselves. Each of us. Our lives depend on it. We must start an army. A Planetary Army. I know that everywhere we have forces amongst the people. The Planetary Party must be formed in every country with this as its major plank. We have a mountain of work to do but that is the way.
I know it.
I wonder if I can make this idea into a reality. I must begin and soon we will have our army forming around the world. If you want to join me then make a comment and sign up to get this blog when I write in it.
Saturday, June 27, 2009
Friday, June 26, 2009
OxyContin is a nasty drug. Michael Jackson used it.
A law enforcement official briefed on the pop star's death tells ABC that Jackson was heavily addicted to the painkiller OxyContin and received daily doses of the drug as well as Demerol.
On Wed. June 3rd I posted an article regarding OxyContin.
the June 2nd newsletter from Novus Medical Detox Center in Florida. They deal with people who are addicted to prescription drugs. The newsletter dealt with the Pharma hearings in Washington regarding the drug Oxycotin. It is described as legal heroin by Steve James the director of the Detox Center. He is directly involved with the hearings. The report is valuable reading to understand the real dilemma ordinary citizens are in. http://bit.ly/Qn3LW
On Wed. June 3rd I posted an article regarding OxyContin.
the June 2nd newsletter from Novus Medical Detox Center in Florida. They deal with people who are addicted to prescription drugs. The newsletter dealt with the Pharma hearings in Washington regarding the drug Oxycotin. It is described as legal heroin by Steve James the director of the Detox Center. He is directly involved with the hearings. The report is valuable reading to understand the real dilemma ordinary citizens are in. http://bit.ly/Qn3LW
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
SCARE HEADLINE Girl, 6, first child in Ont. to die from H1N1 flu
I have noted IN BOLD all the scares and all the questions this Canadian Press article raises. It seems to me that there is a lot of goobly goop being presented and not much real substance that would encourage me to feel good about our Government already spending millions on an untested Flu vaccine against the swine flu. Pharma will profit and money needed for our health care system will go to them.
SCARE HEADLINE Girl, 6, first child in Ont. to die from H1N1 flu
Updated Mon. Jun. 22 2009 4:52 PM ET
The Canadian Press
REASON WHY I THINK IT is A SCARE HEADLINE TORONTO -- A six-year-old girl from Peel Region west of Toronto has become the 14th Canadian to die after contracting swine flu, but officials were unsure Monday what role the H1N1 virus played in her death.
Authorities are not releasing the name of the girl, who is believed to be the youngest person in Canada with the virus to have died.
STATED AS HAVING FLU LIKE SYMPTOMS BUT NOT OBVIOUSLY KNOWN FOR SURE IF SWINE FLU Public health officials said the girl showed the usual symptoms of a flu -- coughing and fever -- on June 14, and died the next day without having been admitted to hospital.
HEADLINE MAKES PRESUMPTIONS WHEN CORONER DOES NOT KNOW CAUSE OF DEATH The coroner's office is still investigating the cause of the six-year-old's death, said Dr. Arlene King, Ontario's chief medical officer of health.
"While the H1N1 virus appears to have been a factor in the girl's death, the exact role the virus played is under investigation by the office of the chief coroner," King said.
"We are also investigating whether the child had any underlying medical conditions."
Laboratory tests last Friday confirmed the young girl did have the H1N1 virus, but she was not showing any symptoms the last day she had gone to school, King said.
"We do not recommend that any schools be closed if there is a suspected or confirmed case (of swine flu)," she said.
"I encourage parents to continue to send their kids to school unless they're feeling ill."
Health Minister David Caplan offered his condolences to the girl's family, friends and classmates, and said the province would continue its efforts to stay on top of the flu pandemic.
"As a father I can only imagine the difficulties they're facing," Caplan said. "It's something that no parent should ever have to go through."
"It's also a reminder about why we need to, and indeed have, remained vigilant in monitoring the H1N1 situation."
THIS WIDESPREAD FLU IN TORONTO HAS CAUSED IN TOTAL 14 DEATHS IN ALL CANADA SO MAYBE WE ARE BEING MISLEAD BY THESE STATEMENTS THAT WANT US TO SUPPORT VACCINES. FLU IS HERE EVERY YEAR AND IN TOTAL I DO BELIEVE THAT THIS YEAR HAS BEEN A MILD YEAR. King said the influenza outbreak is widespread in the Greater Toronto Area, including neighbouring Peel Region, and warned there will be more illnesses and deaths from H1N1 before the pandemic is over.
"We will expect this disease to wax and wane over the next 12 months," she said.
"It will come in waves, and there will be periods when we have more illness, more hospitalizations and very tragically, more deaths."
WE HAVE SO FAR 14 DEATHS IN ALL OF CANADA REPORTED TO BE SOMEHOW CONNECTED TO THE SWINE FLU AND YET THIS SAYS WE CAN EXPECT ON AVERAGE 500 DEATHS IN ONTARIO EACH YEAR ATTRIBUTED TO FLU. ODDLY UNBALANCED FOR WE ARE NOT SPENDING MILLIONS TO AVERT THESE NORMAL 500 DEATHS SO WHY FOR A FLU STRAIN KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN AROUND FOR YEARS.Ontario reports an average of 9,000 cases of seasonal flu each year, and approximately 500 deaths, including two or three deaths of children under age 19.
"So far this year four children have died with influenza (in Ontario)," she said.
THIS CONFIRMS THAT MOST WHO DIED AFTER CONTRACTING SWINE FLU HAD OTHER CHRONIC MEDICAL CONDITIONS Since the swine flu outbreak started in late April, 13 other people across Canada who had the H1N1 virus have died, but most had other chronic medical conditions.
THIS IS A SCARE STATEMENT FOR IT DOES NOT TELL US HOW MANY OF THE SICK HAVE UNDERLYING CHRONIC CONDITIONS However, dozens of people remain in hospitals across the country, including about 20 in Ontario and more than 30 people showing severe symptoms who remain in intensive care units at Manitoba hospitals.
ARE THEY SAYING HERE THAT THIS SWINE FLU IS THIS YEARS REGULAR FLU FOR I HAVE READ NOWHERE ABOUT A REGULAR FLU WHICH SHOULD BE HERE AT THIS TIME OF YEAR AND SHOULD CAUSE ABOUT 500 DEATHS. There have been more than 2,650 confirmed cases of swine flu in Ontario -- and more than 5,700 across Canada -- but most are considered mild with symptoms very similar to an annual seasonal flu.
THE 1918 FLU KILLED MILLIONS OF PEOPLE. ARE WE NOT OVERREACTING TO THIS STRAIN THAT HAS BEEN AROUND FOR YEARS AND IS WELL KNOWN. THE GLOBAL TOTAL OF DEATHS TO DATE DOES NOT EQUAL ONTARIO'S NORMAL TOTAL OF FLU DEATHS EACH YEAR. Globally, H1N1 has been confirmed in nearly 45,000 people in more than 90 countries, with about 180 deaths attributed to the virus.
W.H.O. HAS SET US UP TO BE SCARED AND TO SUPPORT THE VACCINES NOW BEING HURRIEDLY BEING MADE FOR THE FALL. MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS WILL BE SPENT TAKING NEEDED MONEY AWAY FROM OUR ALREADY IMPOVERISHED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. IT IS TIME TO EXAMINE WHAT WE ARE DOING.
SCARE HEADLINE Girl, 6, first child in Ont. to die from H1N1 flu
Updated Mon. Jun. 22 2009 4:52 PM ET
The Canadian Press
REASON WHY I THINK IT is A SCARE HEADLINE TORONTO -- A six-year-old girl from Peel Region west of Toronto has become the 14th Canadian to die after contracting swine flu, but officials were unsure Monday what role the H1N1 virus played in her death.
Authorities are not releasing the name of the girl, who is believed to be the youngest person in Canada with the virus to have died.
STATED AS HAVING FLU LIKE SYMPTOMS BUT NOT OBVIOUSLY KNOWN FOR SURE IF SWINE FLU Public health officials said the girl showed the usual symptoms of a flu -- coughing and fever -- on June 14, and died the next day without having been admitted to hospital.
HEADLINE MAKES PRESUMPTIONS WHEN CORONER DOES NOT KNOW CAUSE OF DEATH The coroner's office is still investigating the cause of the six-year-old's death, said Dr. Arlene King, Ontario's chief medical officer of health.
"While the H1N1 virus appears to have been a factor in the girl's death, the exact role the virus played is under investigation by the office of the chief coroner," King said.
"We are also investigating whether the child had any underlying medical conditions."
Laboratory tests last Friday confirmed the young girl did have the H1N1 virus, but she was not showing any symptoms the last day she had gone to school, King said.
"We do not recommend that any schools be closed if there is a suspected or confirmed case (of swine flu)," she said.
"I encourage parents to continue to send their kids to school unless they're feeling ill."
Health Minister David Caplan offered his condolences to the girl's family, friends and classmates, and said the province would continue its efforts to stay on top of the flu pandemic.
"As a father I can only imagine the difficulties they're facing," Caplan said. "It's something that no parent should ever have to go through."
"It's also a reminder about why we need to, and indeed have, remained vigilant in monitoring the H1N1 situation."
THIS WIDESPREAD FLU IN TORONTO HAS CAUSED IN TOTAL 14 DEATHS IN ALL CANADA SO MAYBE WE ARE BEING MISLEAD BY THESE STATEMENTS THAT WANT US TO SUPPORT VACCINES. FLU IS HERE EVERY YEAR AND IN TOTAL I DO BELIEVE THAT THIS YEAR HAS BEEN A MILD YEAR. King said the influenza outbreak is widespread in the Greater Toronto Area, including neighbouring Peel Region, and warned there will be more illnesses and deaths from H1N1 before the pandemic is over.
"We will expect this disease to wax and wane over the next 12 months," she said.
"It will come in waves, and there will be periods when we have more illness, more hospitalizations and very tragically, more deaths."
WE HAVE SO FAR 14 DEATHS IN ALL OF CANADA REPORTED TO BE SOMEHOW CONNECTED TO THE SWINE FLU AND YET THIS SAYS WE CAN EXPECT ON AVERAGE 500 DEATHS IN ONTARIO EACH YEAR ATTRIBUTED TO FLU. ODDLY UNBALANCED FOR WE ARE NOT SPENDING MILLIONS TO AVERT THESE NORMAL 500 DEATHS SO WHY FOR A FLU STRAIN KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN AROUND FOR YEARS.Ontario reports an average of 9,000 cases of seasonal flu each year, and approximately 500 deaths, including two or three deaths of children under age 19.
"So far this year four children have died with influenza (in Ontario)," she said.
THIS CONFIRMS THAT MOST WHO DIED AFTER CONTRACTING SWINE FLU HAD OTHER CHRONIC MEDICAL CONDITIONS Since the swine flu outbreak started in late April, 13 other people across Canada who had the H1N1 virus have died, but most had other chronic medical conditions.
THIS IS A SCARE STATEMENT FOR IT DOES NOT TELL US HOW MANY OF THE SICK HAVE UNDERLYING CHRONIC CONDITIONS However, dozens of people remain in hospitals across the country, including about 20 in Ontario and more than 30 people showing severe symptoms who remain in intensive care units at Manitoba hospitals.
ARE THEY SAYING HERE THAT THIS SWINE FLU IS THIS YEARS REGULAR FLU FOR I HAVE READ NOWHERE ABOUT A REGULAR FLU WHICH SHOULD BE HERE AT THIS TIME OF YEAR AND SHOULD CAUSE ABOUT 500 DEATHS. There have been more than 2,650 confirmed cases of swine flu in Ontario -- and more than 5,700 across Canada -- but most are considered mild with symptoms very similar to an annual seasonal flu.
THE 1918 FLU KILLED MILLIONS OF PEOPLE. ARE WE NOT OVERREACTING TO THIS STRAIN THAT HAS BEEN AROUND FOR YEARS AND IS WELL KNOWN. THE GLOBAL TOTAL OF DEATHS TO DATE DOES NOT EQUAL ONTARIO'S NORMAL TOTAL OF FLU DEATHS EACH YEAR. Globally, H1N1 has been confirmed in nearly 45,000 people in more than 90 countries, with about 180 deaths attributed to the virus.
W.H.O. HAS SET US UP TO BE SCARED AND TO SUPPORT THE VACCINES NOW BEING HURRIEDLY BEING MADE FOR THE FALL. MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS WILL BE SPENT TAKING NEEDED MONEY AWAY FROM OUR ALREADY IMPOVERISHED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. IT IS TIME TO EXAMINE WHAT WE ARE DOING.
Friday, June 19, 2009
Drugmakers Rush to Produce a Swine Flu Vaccine
LONDON -- With swine flu now an official pandemic, the race is on among drugmakers to produce a vaccine. GlaxoSmithKline said Thursday after the World Health Organization declared a global flu epidemic that it would be ready
within weeks to begin large-scale vaccine production. Sanofi-Aventis also said it had started working on its own version.
On Friday, Swiss pharma giant Novartis announced it had created an experimental vaccine that has not been tested in people. Novartis' vaccine was made via a cell-based technology that may prove faster than the traditional way of making vaccines, which relies on chicken eggs.
Many rich countries like Britain, Canada and France signed contracts with pharmaceuticals long ago, guaranteeing them access to pandemic vaccine. WHO and others estimate that about 2.4 billion doses of pandemic vaccine could be available in about a year. The likely scramble for vaccines will leave many people in poorer countries empty-handed.
So far, swine flu has been mostly detected in developed countries like the United States, Europe, Japan and Australia. "We do not know how this virus will behave under conditions typically found in the developing world," WHO chief Dr.Margaret Chan said Thursday. She said the agency expects to see a "bleaker" picture as the virus makes its way to Africa and Asia.
WHO spokesman Gregory Hartl said officials were concerned people in poorer countries and those fighting other health problems like malaria, tuberculosis, malnutrition and pneumonia might be more susceptible to swine flu.
On Friday, WHO said that 74 countries had reported nearly 30,000 cases including 145 deaths. But so far, the virus appears to be mild. Most people don't need medical treatment to get better. But the virus might have a more devastating effect in people with underlying health problems. About half of the people who have died from swine flu have had complications like asthma, diabetes, and obesity. "Any population that has health challenges is potentially going to be at higher risk with H1N1 (swine flu)," Hartl said.
In May, officials led by Chan and U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon asked vaccine makers to save a portion of their production for poor countries. Chan was aiming to get 10 percent of the global pandemic vaccine supply reserved for poor nations.
Some companies have agreed to help. GlaxoSmithKline PLC offered to donate 50 million doses of pandemic vaccine to WHO for distribution to developing countries.
During the bird flu crisis, Sanofi-Aventis promised WHO about 60 million doses based on the H5N1 strain. WHO is now talking with Sanofi to switch some or all of those vaccines over to swine flu doses.
Because more than 95 percent of flu vaccines are still made in eggs, experts say the Novartis announcement is unlikely to significantly boost the world's pandemic vaccine supply.
But the news pushed up Novartis shares by 4.4 percent to close at 45 Swiss francs ($41.84) on the Zurich exchange Friday.
WHO and nongovernment organizations like Oxfam are continuing to ask drugmakers to make some of their pandemic vaccines available for poorer countries at a cheaper price, as well as asking donor countries and organizations to pay for the doses.
But in a pandemic situation, WHO's attempts to secure vaccine for the poor and even the contracts countries have signed
with drugmakers may make little difference to who actually gets the vaccine, some experts say.
In previous pandemics, vaccines have never left the country where they are made before all of that country's own needs
Drugmakers Rush to Produce a Swine Flu Vaccine http://www.thirdage.com/print/1505900
1 of 2 6/19/09 3:25 PM
have been met.
"WHO can say whatever it wishes, but pharmaceutical companies will take their marching orders from the politicians," said
David Fedson, a vaccines expert and former professor of medicine at the University of Virginia.
"Do you think any doses of vaccine made in France, Germany, the Czech Republic or anywhere will be allowed out to go to other countries just because there's a contract?" Fedson said.
Ultimately, Fedson said health officials and politicians will have to deal with a limited amount of vaccine for the billions worldwide who want it. "There's a lot of dirtiness in vaccine politics," he said. "We may try our best, but we won't succeed
in doing what's necessary."
Source URL: http://www.thirdage.com/cold-flu/drugmakers-rush-to-produce-a-swine-flu-vaccine
Article Source: Associated Press/AP Online
Drugmakers Rush to Produce a Swine Flu Vaccine http://www.thirdage.com/print/1505900
So. I and millions are going to be either asked or ordered to take this new swine flu vaccine. Some was tested years ago but its efficacy is not known. One company has a new way of making it not yet tested on humans.
Poor countries they do not know about at all and will only get some of the vaccines.
If one has underlying conditions it seems you are at greater risk if you take the vaccines.
I am still thinking about the forced folly we are encouraged and frightened to take part in and I for one will use Homeopathy which does very well helping flu sufferers and does not effect other problems the body is having as it stimulates the immune system. Half the patients who have died so far died of post complications or preexisting conditions that bloomed due to the weakening of the body during the flu.
If Homeopathy had been used in many of these cases I am sure the death rate would have been lower.
We are paying millions because we are being frightened and led to take vaccines which are questionable ways to deal with the flu.
within weeks to begin large-scale vaccine production. Sanofi-Aventis also said it had started working on its own version.
On Friday, Swiss pharma giant Novartis announced it had created an experimental vaccine that has not been tested in people. Novartis' vaccine was made via a cell-based technology that may prove faster than the traditional way of making vaccines, which relies on chicken eggs.
Many rich countries like Britain, Canada and France signed contracts with pharmaceuticals long ago, guaranteeing them access to pandemic vaccine. WHO and others estimate that about 2.4 billion doses of pandemic vaccine could be available in about a year. The likely scramble for vaccines will leave many people in poorer countries empty-handed.
So far, swine flu has been mostly detected in developed countries like the United States, Europe, Japan and Australia. "We do not know how this virus will behave under conditions typically found in the developing world," WHO chief Dr.Margaret Chan said Thursday. She said the agency expects to see a "bleaker" picture as the virus makes its way to Africa and Asia.
WHO spokesman Gregory Hartl said officials were concerned people in poorer countries and those fighting other health problems like malaria, tuberculosis, malnutrition and pneumonia might be more susceptible to swine flu.
On Friday, WHO said that 74 countries had reported nearly 30,000 cases including 145 deaths. But so far, the virus appears to be mild. Most people don't need medical treatment to get better. But the virus might have a more devastating effect in people with underlying health problems. About half of the people who have died from swine flu have had complications like asthma, diabetes, and obesity. "Any population that has health challenges is potentially going to be at higher risk with H1N1 (swine flu)," Hartl said.
In May, officials led by Chan and U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon asked vaccine makers to save a portion of their production for poor countries. Chan was aiming to get 10 percent of the global pandemic vaccine supply reserved for poor nations.
Some companies have agreed to help. GlaxoSmithKline PLC offered to donate 50 million doses of pandemic vaccine to WHO for distribution to developing countries.
During the bird flu crisis, Sanofi-Aventis promised WHO about 60 million doses based on the H5N1 strain. WHO is now talking with Sanofi to switch some or all of those vaccines over to swine flu doses.
Because more than 95 percent of flu vaccines are still made in eggs, experts say the Novartis announcement is unlikely to significantly boost the world's pandemic vaccine supply.
But the news pushed up Novartis shares by 4.4 percent to close at 45 Swiss francs ($41.84) on the Zurich exchange Friday.
WHO and nongovernment organizations like Oxfam are continuing to ask drugmakers to make some of their pandemic vaccines available for poorer countries at a cheaper price, as well as asking donor countries and organizations to pay for the doses.
But in a pandemic situation, WHO's attempts to secure vaccine for the poor and even the contracts countries have signed
with drugmakers may make little difference to who actually gets the vaccine, some experts say.
In previous pandemics, vaccines have never left the country where they are made before all of that country's own needs
Drugmakers Rush to Produce a Swine Flu Vaccine http://www.thirdage.com/print/1505900
1 of 2 6/19/09 3:25 PM
have been met.
"WHO can say whatever it wishes, but pharmaceutical companies will take their marching orders from the politicians," said
David Fedson, a vaccines expert and former professor of medicine at the University of Virginia.
"Do you think any doses of vaccine made in France, Germany, the Czech Republic or anywhere will be allowed out to go to other countries just because there's a contract?" Fedson said.
Ultimately, Fedson said health officials and politicians will have to deal with a limited amount of vaccine for the billions worldwide who want it. "There's a lot of dirtiness in vaccine politics," he said. "We may try our best, but we won't succeed
in doing what's necessary."
Source URL: http://www.thirdage.com/cold-flu/drugmakers-rush-to-produce-a-swine-flu-vaccine
Article Source: Associated Press/AP Online
Drugmakers Rush to Produce a Swine Flu Vaccine http://www.thirdage.com/print/1505900
So. I and millions are going to be either asked or ordered to take this new swine flu vaccine. Some was tested years ago but its efficacy is not known. One company has a new way of making it not yet tested on humans.
Poor countries they do not know about at all and will only get some of the vaccines.
If one has underlying conditions it seems you are at greater risk if you take the vaccines.
I am still thinking about the forced folly we are encouraged and frightened to take part in and I for one will use Homeopathy which does very well helping flu sufferers and does not effect other problems the body is having as it stimulates the immune system. Half the patients who have died so far died of post complications or preexisting conditions that bloomed due to the weakening of the body during the flu.
If Homeopathy had been used in many of these cases I am sure the death rate would have been lower.
We are paying millions because we are being frightened and led to take vaccines which are questionable ways to deal with the flu.
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
A conversation with a vaccine scientist.
jon rappoport
Nomorefakenews,com
Writer, investigative reporter, commentator
JON RAPPOPORT
Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.
A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won't say which ones.
Q: Why not?
A: I want to preserve my privacy.
Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?
A: I believe I could lose my pension.
Q: On what grounds?
A: The grounds don't matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.
Q: Harassed by whom?
A: The FBI.
Q: Really?
A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.
Q: So much for free speech.
A: I was "part of the inner circle." If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.
Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?
A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall "brilliance" of modern medicine.
Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?
A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.
Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.
A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.
Q: Why?
A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.
Q: And then?
A: I did my own investigation.
Q: What conclusions did you come to?
A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.
Q: What conditions?
A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don't contract the diseases as easily.
Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation?
A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.
Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?
A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.
Q: Why?
A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.
Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?
A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases -- say, meningitis -- that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.
Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.
A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.
Q: Which is?
A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.
Q: So you're saying that we have been treated to a false history.
A: Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.
Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.
A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines.
Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.
A: Well yes, that happened. But that's not what I mean. The SV40 got into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I'm talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The careless errors. SV40, which was later found in cancer tumors -- that was what I would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the manufacturing process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don't know are in those kidneys.
Q: Okay, but let's ignore that distinction between different types of contaminants for a moment. What contaminants did you find in your many years of work with vaccines?
A: All right. I'll give you some of what I came across, and I'll also give you what colleagues of mine found. Here's a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba.
Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.
Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in the vaccines.
A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time -- which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.
Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the place.
A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.
Q: How were your findings received?
A: Basically, it was, don't worry, this can't be helped. In making vaccines, you use various animals' tissue, and that's where this kind of contamination enters in. Of course, I'm not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.
Q: This information is pretty staggering.
A: Yes. And I'm just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many others there are? Others we don't find because we don't think to look for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea.We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans.
Q: And beyond the purity issue?
A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related "killer cells."
Q: The immune system is?
A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It's all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.
Q: So the level of general health is important.
A: More than important. Vital.
Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?
A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the diagnosis. Then, you've concealed the root cause of the problem.
Q: And that happens?
A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the diseases they are now supposed to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, it's circular reasoning. It's a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault. If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the vaccine.
Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?
A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But they would never go public, even within their companies.
Q: What was the turning point for you?
A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.
Q: Did you investigate?
A: Yes, informally. I found that this baby was completely healthy before the vaccination. There was no reason for his death, except the vaccine. That started my doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe that the baby had gotten a bad shot from a bad lot. But as I looked into this further, I found that was not the case in this instance. I was being drawn into a spiral of doubt that increased over time. I continued to investigate. I found that, contrary to what I thought, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way.
Q: What do you mean?
A: For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term follow-up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again, the assumption is made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense.
Q: Why doesn't it make sense?
A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn't that be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn't that be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?
Q: And that is what you found?
A: Yes. You are dealing with correlations, most of the time.Correlations are not perfect. But if you get 500 parents whose children have suffered neurological damage during a one-year period after having a vaccine, this should be sufficient to spark off an intense investigation.
Q: Has it been enough?
A: No. Never. This tells you something right away.
Q: Which is?
A: The people doing the investigation are not really interested in looking at the facts. They assume that the vaccines are safe. So, when they do investigate, they invariably come up with exonerations of the vaccines. They say, "This vaccine is safe." But what do they base those judgments on? They base them on definitions and ideas which automatically rule out a condemnation of the vaccine.
Q: There are numerous cases where a vaccine campaign has failed. Where people have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.
A: Yes, there are many such instances. And there the evidence is simply ignored. It's discounted. The experts say, if they say anything at all, that this is just an isolated situation, but overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe. But if you add up all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred, you realize that these are NOT isolated situations.
Q: Did you ever discuss what we are talking about here with colleagues, when you were still working in the vaccine establishment?
A: Yes I did.
Q: What happened?
A: Several times I was told to keep quiet. It was made clear that I should go back to work and forget my misgivings. On a few occasions, I encountered fear. Colleagues tried to avoid me. They felt they could be labeled with "guilt by association." All in all, though, I behaved myself.I made sure I didn't create problems for myself.
Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?
A: First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.
Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?
A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.
Q: This network you speak of.
A: It has accumulated a huge amount of information about vaccines. The question is, how is a successful strategy going to be mounted? For these people, that is a difficult issue.
Q: And in the industrialized nations?
A: The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing. Mainly because people have the freedom to question medicines. However, if the choice issue [the right to take or reject any medicine] does not gather steam, these coming mandates about vaccines against biowarefare germs are going to win out. This is an important time.
Q: The furor over the hepatits B vaccine seems one good avenue.
A: I think so, yes. To say that babies must have the vaccine-and then in the next breath, admitting that a person gets hep B from sexual contacts and shared needles -- is a ridiculous juxtaposition. Medical authorities try to cover themselves by saying that 20,000 or so children in the US get hep B every year from "unknown causes," and that's why every baby must have the vaccine. I dispute that 20,00 figure and the so-called studies that back it up.
Q: Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital.
A: Yes. Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the vaccine and autism are stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair's wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his "personal and family life." In any event, I believe his wife has been muzzled. I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their children were severely damaged by the MMR.
Q: British reporters should try to get through to her.
A: They have been trying. But I think she has made a deal with her husband to keep quiet, no matter what. She could do a great deal of good if she breaks her promise. I have been told she is under pressure, and not just from her husband. At the level she occupies, MI6 and British health authorities get into the act. It is thought of as a matter of national security.
Q: Well, it is national security, once you understand the medical cartel.
A: It is global security. The cartel operates in every nation. It zealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning these vaccines is on the same level as a Vatican bishop questioning the sanctity of the sacrament of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.
Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity stating publicly that he will not take a vaccine is committing career suicide.
A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully to the medical cartel. There are several reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge amount of publicity if he says ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at your demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the FDA. Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who has spoken out in any way against the medical cartel.
Q: Within the National Institutes of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic frame of mind?
A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that money. They don't need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends on the idea that, by and large, modern medicine is very successful on every frontier. To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole enterprise. You might therefore think that NIH is the last place one should think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits have been conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that facility, something might start. A spark might go off. You might get, with further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers -- a few -- might start leaking information.
Q: A good idea.
A: People in suits standing as close to the buildings as the police will allow. People in business suits, in jogging suits, mothers and babies. Well-off people. Poor people. All sorts of people.
Q: What about the combined destructive power of a number of vaccines given to babies these days?
A: It is a travesty and a crime. There are no real studies of any depth which have been done on that. Again, the assumption is made that vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But the truth is, vaccines are not safe. Therefore the potential damage increases when you give many of them in a short time period.
Q: Then we have the fall flu season.
A: Yes. As if only in the autumn do these germs float in to the US from Asia. The public swallows that premise. If it happens in April, it is a bad cold. If it happens in October, it is the flu.
Q: Do you regret having worked all those years in the vaccine field?
A: Yes. But after this interview, I'll regret it a little less. And I work in other ways. I give out information to certain people, when I think they will use it well.
Q: What is one thing you want the public to understand?
A: That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not there.
Q: The things that are not there.
A: Yes.
Q: To avoid any confusion, I'd like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.
A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn't get THAT disease, but at some later time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what's called autism, or it could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.
Q: Is there any way to compare the relative frequency of these different outcomes?
A: No. Because the follow-up is poor. We can only guess. If you ask, out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine, how many get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine, there is a no reliable answer. That is what I'm saying. Vaccines are superstitions. And with superstitions, you don't get facts you can use. You only get stories, most of which are designed to enforce the superstition. But, from many vaccine campaigns, we can piece together a narrative that does reveal some very disturbing things. People have been harmed. The harm is real, and it can be deep and it can mean death. The harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we have been led to believe.In the US, there are groups of mothers who are testifying about autism and childhood vaccines. They are coming forward and standing up at meetings.They are essentially trying to fill in the gap that has been created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.
Q: Let me ask you this. If you took a child in, say, Boston and you raised that child with good nutritious food and he exercised every day and he was loved by his parents, and he didn't get the measles vaccine, what would be his health status compared with the average child in Boston who eats poorly and watches five hours of TV a day and gets the measles vaccine?
A: Of course there are many factors involved, but I would bet on the better health status for the first child. If he gets measles, if he gets it when he is nine, the chances are it will be much lighter than the measles the second child might get. I would bet on the first child every time.
Q: How long did you work with vaccines?
A: A long time. Longer than ten years.
Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?
A: No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.
Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy.
A: The operative word is "appear." What about all the children who can't focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. You get one or the other, but not both.
Q: So we come to the level playing field.
A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information.
Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don't get shots.
A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person's responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win.
_________________________________________________________________
Dr. Mark Randall is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the US government's National Institutes of Health.
Mark retired during the last decade. He says he was "disgusted with what he discovered about vaccines."
As you know, since the beginning of nomorefakenews, I have been launching an attack against non-scientific and dangerous assertions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
Mark has been one of my sources.
He is a little reluctant to speak out, even under the cover of anonymity, but with the current push to make vaccines mandatory -- with penalties like quarantine lurking in the wings -- he has decided to break his silence.
He lives comfortably in retirement, but like many of my long-time sources, he has developed a conscience about his former work. Mark is well aware of the scope of the medical cartel and its goals of depopulation, mind control, and general debilitation of populations.
http://www.whale.to/v/rapp.html
http://www.whale.to/w/rappoport.html
Nomorefakenews,com
Writer, investigative reporter, commentator
JON RAPPOPORT
Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.
A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won't say which ones.
Q: Why not?
A: I want to preserve my privacy.
Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?
A: I believe I could lose my pension.
Q: On what grounds?
A: The grounds don't matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.
Q: Harassed by whom?
A: The FBI.
Q: Really?
A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.
Q: So much for free speech.
A: I was "part of the inner circle." If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.
Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?
A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall "brilliance" of modern medicine.
Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?
A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.
Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.
A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.
Q: Why?
A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.
Q: And then?
A: I did my own investigation.
Q: What conclusions did you come to?
A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.
Q: What conditions?
A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don't contract the diseases as easily.
Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation?
A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.
Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?
A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.
Q: Why?
A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.
Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?
A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases -- say, meningitis -- that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.
Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.
A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.
Q: Which is?
A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.
Q: So you're saying that we have been treated to a false history.
A: Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.
Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.
A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines.
Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.
A: Well yes, that happened. But that's not what I mean. The SV40 got into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I'm talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The careless errors. SV40, which was later found in cancer tumors -- that was what I would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the manufacturing process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don't know are in those kidneys.
Q: Okay, but let's ignore that distinction between different types of contaminants for a moment. What contaminants did you find in your many years of work with vaccines?
A: All right. I'll give you some of what I came across, and I'll also give you what colleagues of mine found. Here's a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba.
Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.
Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in the vaccines.
A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time -- which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.
Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the place.
A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.
Q: How were your findings received?
A: Basically, it was, don't worry, this can't be helped. In making vaccines, you use various animals' tissue, and that's where this kind of contamination enters in. Of course, I'm not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.
Q: This information is pretty staggering.
A: Yes. And I'm just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many others there are? Others we don't find because we don't think to look for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea.We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans.
Q: And beyond the purity issue?
A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related "killer cells."
Q: The immune system is?
A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It's all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.
Q: So the level of general health is important.
A: More than important. Vital.
Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?
A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the diagnosis. Then, you've concealed the root cause of the problem.
Q: And that happens?
A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the diseases they are now supposed to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, it's circular reasoning. It's a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault. If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the vaccine.
Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?
A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But they would never go public, even within their companies.
Q: What was the turning point for you?
A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.
Q: Did you investigate?
A: Yes, informally. I found that this baby was completely healthy before the vaccination. There was no reason for his death, except the vaccine. That started my doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe that the baby had gotten a bad shot from a bad lot. But as I looked into this further, I found that was not the case in this instance. I was being drawn into a spiral of doubt that increased over time. I continued to investigate. I found that, contrary to what I thought, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way.
Q: What do you mean?
A: For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term follow-up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again, the assumption is made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense.
Q: Why doesn't it make sense?
A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn't that be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn't that be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?
Q: And that is what you found?
A: Yes. You are dealing with correlations, most of the time.Correlations are not perfect. But if you get 500 parents whose children have suffered neurological damage during a one-year period after having a vaccine, this should be sufficient to spark off an intense investigation.
Q: Has it been enough?
A: No. Never. This tells you something right away.
Q: Which is?
A: The people doing the investigation are not really interested in looking at the facts. They assume that the vaccines are safe. So, when they do investigate, they invariably come up with exonerations of the vaccines. They say, "This vaccine is safe." But what do they base those judgments on? They base them on definitions and ideas which automatically rule out a condemnation of the vaccine.
Q: There are numerous cases where a vaccine campaign has failed. Where people have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.
A: Yes, there are many such instances. And there the evidence is simply ignored. It's discounted. The experts say, if they say anything at all, that this is just an isolated situation, but overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe. But if you add up all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred, you realize that these are NOT isolated situations.
Q: Did you ever discuss what we are talking about here with colleagues, when you were still working in the vaccine establishment?
A: Yes I did.
Q: What happened?
A: Several times I was told to keep quiet. It was made clear that I should go back to work and forget my misgivings. On a few occasions, I encountered fear. Colleagues tried to avoid me. They felt they could be labeled with "guilt by association." All in all, though, I behaved myself.I made sure I didn't create problems for myself.
Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?
A: First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.
Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?
A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.
Q: This network you speak of.
A: It has accumulated a huge amount of information about vaccines. The question is, how is a successful strategy going to be mounted? For these people, that is a difficult issue.
Q: And in the industrialized nations?
A: The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing. Mainly because people have the freedom to question medicines. However, if the choice issue [the right to take or reject any medicine] does not gather steam, these coming mandates about vaccines against biowarefare germs are going to win out. This is an important time.
Q: The furor over the hepatits B vaccine seems one good avenue.
A: I think so, yes. To say that babies must have the vaccine-and then in the next breath, admitting that a person gets hep B from sexual contacts and shared needles -- is a ridiculous juxtaposition. Medical authorities try to cover themselves by saying that 20,000 or so children in the US get hep B every year from "unknown causes," and that's why every baby must have the vaccine. I dispute that 20,00 figure and the so-called studies that back it up.
Q: Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital.
A: Yes. Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the vaccine and autism are stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair's wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his "personal and family life." In any event, I believe his wife has been muzzled. I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their children were severely damaged by the MMR.
Q: British reporters should try to get through to her.
A: They have been trying. But I think she has made a deal with her husband to keep quiet, no matter what. She could do a great deal of good if she breaks her promise. I have been told she is under pressure, and not just from her husband. At the level she occupies, MI6 and British health authorities get into the act. It is thought of as a matter of national security.
Q: Well, it is national security, once you understand the medical cartel.
A: It is global security. The cartel operates in every nation. It zealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning these vaccines is on the same level as a Vatican bishop questioning the sanctity of the sacrament of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.
Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity stating publicly that he will not take a vaccine is committing career suicide.
A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully to the medical cartel. There are several reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge amount of publicity if he says ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at your demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the FDA. Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who has spoken out in any way against the medical cartel.
Q: Within the National Institutes of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic frame of mind?
A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that money. They don't need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends on the idea that, by and large, modern medicine is very successful on every frontier. To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole enterprise. You might therefore think that NIH is the last place one should think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits have been conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that facility, something might start. A spark might go off. You might get, with further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers -- a few -- might start leaking information.
Q: A good idea.
A: People in suits standing as close to the buildings as the police will allow. People in business suits, in jogging suits, mothers and babies. Well-off people. Poor people. All sorts of people.
Q: What about the combined destructive power of a number of vaccines given to babies these days?
A: It is a travesty and a crime. There are no real studies of any depth which have been done on that. Again, the assumption is made that vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But the truth is, vaccines are not safe. Therefore the potential damage increases when you give many of them in a short time period.
Q: Then we have the fall flu season.
A: Yes. As if only in the autumn do these germs float in to the US from Asia. The public swallows that premise. If it happens in April, it is a bad cold. If it happens in October, it is the flu.
Q: Do you regret having worked all those years in the vaccine field?
A: Yes. But after this interview, I'll regret it a little less. And I work in other ways. I give out information to certain people, when I think they will use it well.
Q: What is one thing you want the public to understand?
A: That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not there.
Q: The things that are not there.
A: Yes.
Q: To avoid any confusion, I'd like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.
A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn't get THAT disease, but at some later time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what's called autism, or it could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.
Q: Is there any way to compare the relative frequency of these different outcomes?
A: No. Because the follow-up is poor. We can only guess. If you ask, out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine, how many get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine, there is a no reliable answer. That is what I'm saying. Vaccines are superstitions. And with superstitions, you don't get facts you can use. You only get stories, most of which are designed to enforce the superstition. But, from many vaccine campaigns, we can piece together a narrative that does reveal some very disturbing things. People have been harmed. The harm is real, and it can be deep and it can mean death. The harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we have been led to believe.In the US, there are groups of mothers who are testifying about autism and childhood vaccines. They are coming forward and standing up at meetings.They are essentially trying to fill in the gap that has been created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.
Q: Let me ask you this. If you took a child in, say, Boston and you raised that child with good nutritious food and he exercised every day and he was loved by his parents, and he didn't get the measles vaccine, what would be his health status compared with the average child in Boston who eats poorly and watches five hours of TV a day and gets the measles vaccine?
A: Of course there are many factors involved, but I would bet on the better health status for the first child. If he gets measles, if he gets it when he is nine, the chances are it will be much lighter than the measles the second child might get. I would bet on the first child every time.
Q: How long did you work with vaccines?
A: A long time. Longer than ten years.
Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?
A: No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.
Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy.
A: The operative word is "appear." What about all the children who can't focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. You get one or the other, but not both.
Q: So we come to the level playing field.
A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information.
Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don't get shots.
A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person's responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win.
_________________________________________________________________
Dr. Mark Randall is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the US government's National Institutes of Health.
Mark retired during the last decade. He says he was "disgusted with what he discovered about vaccines."
As you know, since the beginning of nomorefakenews, I have been launching an attack against non-scientific and dangerous assertions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
Mark has been one of my sources.
He is a little reluctant to speak out, even under the cover of anonymity, but with the current push to make vaccines mandatory -- with penalties like quarantine lurking in the wings -- he has decided to break his silence.
He lives comfortably in retirement, but like many of my long-time sources, he has developed a conscience about his former work. Mark is well aware of the scope of the medical cartel and its goals of depopulation, mind control, and general debilitation of populations.
http://www.whale.to/v/rapp.html
http://www.whale.to/w/rappoport.html
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Carrots-Rumours-Lies-Truth-Pharma-Distortion-Deflection
I belong to a group called Boomer Authority http://boomerauthority.ning.com/ Boomers are multiplying on the web,facebook,twitter and everywhere information passes. They are diverse group and awake. There was a warning sent to our group about tiny packaged carrots not being good. The member who got the warning posted it but two days later there was a scopes report that the rumour was false so the member apologized to the group and made things right. An honest error and an honest effort to right it. How i think life should be conducted.
Yesterday I got the June 2nd newsletter from Novus Medical Detox Center in Florida. They deal with people who are addicted to prescription drugs. The newsletter dealt with the Pharma hearings in Washington regarding the drug Oxycotin. It is described as legal heroin by Steve James the director of the Detox Center. He is directly involved with the hearings. The report is valuable reading to understand the real dilemma ordinary citizens are in. http://bit.ly/Qn3LW
The first obligation of all of corporations is profit to the investors. The Pharma group takes more money from people and governments than any other group of Corporations. They sit on top of the money earners worldwide. The profit figures in total are staggering. The money is all taken out of our Health care systems. Their concern for the patient is secondary. Their techniques of holding us captive are insidious and their medicines damaging to mankind. Think about that for a second; they are damaging mankind.
With their wealth and billions to spend advertising their wares they have captured everyone, WHO,CDC,AMA and most tragically the media through their advertising dollars which means they have captured us too for we are the customers. So we are held in a world wide web of bad health care systems. Pharma even spends millions spreading disinformation about other paradigms of healing to maintain their control of all of us.
Steve James report is an eye opener. It has everything laid out except an answer to the problem for he too is captured by the overall philosophy of the health care system we live under. I know this for he has one of my Pocket Packs with Homeopathic and Bach flower formula stress remedy in it. He has tried one or two of the remedies and even though they have no side effects and might be of great value to his clients he has not seriously engaged in a personal investigation of Homeopathy and flower remedies as a viable and beneficial way of treating disease and dis-ease. Do not misunderstand me; Steve James is a wonderful man who is doing America great service in the work he does. His report is clear and honest and his work for people is heartwarming. His report has no answer to the problem at hand.
There are answers to solving the problem. Some countries like Switzerland are now incorporating alternative health techniques and medicines into their Health Care System and this was voted in by the citizens. India has a mature Homeopathic system which includes hospitals, clinics, universities and practitioners and in some cases they exist side by side with medical facilities and doctors.
I leave this blog with my thoughts that after proper diet, exercise and spiritual centering, the first response to both acute and chronic illnesses should be Homeopathy and Bach formula flower remedies. They have no side effects and they support the immune system to do its own healing work. They neither mask symptoms nor try to kill or oppose the warring factions in the body. They are effective and have proven over time to be so. The remedies in my Pocket Pack have years of history behind them that are exemplary. They are even made the same way as they were in 1800.
We can save billions of dollars if we address the real wrongs in the Medical system we are in now: the Pharmaceutical Company medicines. Arthritis, Excyma, Asthma, Autism, colds, depression plus all the other illnesses we take drugs for do little but add costs in health and dollars to the patients.
I think about my grandchildren when I write this as much as I think about Baby Boomers who are now entering a more fragile life as they age. We can make a difference to ourselves and to everyone if we take a moment and use our natural curiosity to examine how we care for ourselves. I know we will do the right thing. Like the carrot story we can act to correct our errors. It is time.
Yesterday I got the June 2nd newsletter from Novus Medical Detox Center in Florida. They deal with people who are addicted to prescription drugs. The newsletter dealt with the Pharma hearings in Washington regarding the drug Oxycotin. It is described as legal heroin by Steve James the director of the Detox Center. He is directly involved with the hearings. The report is valuable reading to understand the real dilemma ordinary citizens are in. http://bit.ly/Qn3LW
The first obligation of all of corporations is profit to the investors. The Pharma group takes more money from people and governments than any other group of Corporations. They sit on top of the money earners worldwide. The profit figures in total are staggering. The money is all taken out of our Health care systems. Their concern for the patient is secondary. Their techniques of holding us captive are insidious and their medicines damaging to mankind. Think about that for a second; they are damaging mankind.
With their wealth and billions to spend advertising their wares they have captured everyone, WHO,CDC,AMA and most tragically the media through their advertising dollars which means they have captured us too for we are the customers. So we are held in a world wide web of bad health care systems. Pharma even spends millions spreading disinformation about other paradigms of healing to maintain their control of all of us.
Steve James report is an eye opener. It has everything laid out except an answer to the problem for he too is captured by the overall philosophy of the health care system we live under. I know this for he has one of my Pocket Packs with Homeopathic and Bach flower formula stress remedy in it. He has tried one or two of the remedies and even though they have no side effects and might be of great value to his clients he has not seriously engaged in a personal investigation of Homeopathy and flower remedies as a viable and beneficial way of treating disease and dis-ease. Do not misunderstand me; Steve James is a wonderful man who is doing America great service in the work he does. His report is clear and honest and his work for people is heartwarming. His report has no answer to the problem at hand.
There are answers to solving the problem. Some countries like Switzerland are now incorporating alternative health techniques and medicines into their Health Care System and this was voted in by the citizens. India has a mature Homeopathic system which includes hospitals, clinics, universities and practitioners and in some cases they exist side by side with medical facilities and doctors.
I leave this blog with my thoughts that after proper diet, exercise and spiritual centering, the first response to both acute and chronic illnesses should be Homeopathy and Bach formula flower remedies. They have no side effects and they support the immune system to do its own healing work. They neither mask symptoms nor try to kill or oppose the warring factions in the body. They are effective and have proven over time to be so. The remedies in my Pocket Pack have years of history behind them that are exemplary. They are even made the same way as they were in 1800.
We can save billions of dollars if we address the real wrongs in the Medical system we are in now: the Pharmaceutical Company medicines. Arthritis, Excyma, Asthma, Autism, colds, depression plus all the other illnesses we take drugs for do little but add costs in health and dollars to the patients.
I think about my grandchildren when I write this as much as I think about Baby Boomers who are now entering a more fragile life as they age. We can make a difference to ourselves and to everyone if we take a moment and use our natural curiosity to examine how we care for ourselves. I know we will do the right thing. Like the carrot story we can act to correct our errors. It is time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
